CompTIA SecurityX (CAS-005): Cost, Exam Format, and Renewal Math

SecurityX is the certification you reach for when you are already the person other engineers escalate to, and a card that reads “entry level” would undersell what you actually do. It is the exam CompTIA renamed from CASP+ so the credential would stop being mistaken for a professional certification, and it sits alone at the top of CompTIA’s cybersecurity ladder. That top-of-the-ladder position is the whole story of this page: it shapes the price, the exam, and above all the renewal math, which has no easy escape hatch the way every lower CompTIA cert does.

What SecurityX actually certifies

CAS-005 is a hands-on, senior technical exam, not a management credential. It targets security architects and senior engineers who design and implement enterprise security across on-premises and cloud, run governance and risk work, and lead incident response rather than just executing a runbook someone else wrote. CompTIA recommends roughly ten years of general IT experience with at least five in hands-on technical security before you sit it, and although none of that is a hard prerequisite, the exam assumes you have architected real systems and can defend the trade-offs.

That framing matters because SecurityX is the natural next rung above CySA+ and PenTest+ for people who want to stay technical rather than move into pure governance. If your day is still mostly triage in an alert queue, you are not there yet; earn CySA+ first and get architecture reps. And if your goal is the credential that HR filters demand on senior postings and you can meet a formal experience gate, the honest comparison is not against another CompTIA exam at all. It is SecurityX against CISSP, covered below.

What it costs all-in

The voucher is $544 at CompTIA’s own store, up from the $529 this page listed when it was last checked in July 2026, the highest exam price of any CompTIA certification on this site and a step above the $439 the security lineup (Security+, CySA+, PenTest+) costs. There is no free retake, so a failed attempt is another $544, which makes this the CompTIA exam where a practice-question investment pays for itself fastest. CompTIA allows an immediate second attempt but makes you wait 14 days before a third, and its voucher with Retake Assurance prepays the second attempt for $709. Authorized partners and academic stores routinely discount SecurityX vouchers below the $544 list, so buying through a reseller often lands the real out-of-pocket lower.

Prep is where the money should go, not the bootcamp. CompTIA publishes the CAS-005 exam objectives as a free PDF, and at this level that document is a genuine study map rather than a marketing outline. A recognized SecurityX or CASP+ study guide runs $40 to $60, a video course from a known instructor runs $20 to $50 on sale, and a practice bank in the $30 to $60 range earns its keep because the performance-based items reward people who have actually built the controls, not just read about them. Plan for $544 plus $100 to $170 in prep. See exactly where that lands against every other credential on the ROI Index.

The exam itself

CAS-005 gives you a maximum of 90 questions in 165 minutes, one of the longest CompTIA sittings, mixing multiple-choice with performance-based questions. The scoring is the detail candidates miss: unlike Security+ and CySA+, which return a scaled 750 on a 100-to-900 range, SecurityX is graded pass/fail with no number reported at all. You leave knowing only whether you cleared it, which removes the “how close was I” data point people lean on and makes honest timed practice beforehand more important, not less.

Four domains make up the exam: Security Engineering (31 percent, the largest), Security Architecture (27 percent), Security Operations (22 percent), and Governance, Risk, and Compliance (20 percent), spanning cloud and hybrid environments, with the V5 revision folding in far more cloud-native and AI-adjacent attack-and-defense material than the CASP+ era carried. CompTIA does not publish a pass rate for CAS-005, so treat any percentage you find quoted as invented.

Renewal math over 9 years, and why the top of the ladder is expensive

SecurityX is valid three years, so nine years of holding it means two renewals, at years three and six (a renewal at year nine buys years nine to twelve, outside the horizon). Each cycle demands 75 continuing education units, the highest CEU count of any CompTIA certification, which is CompTIA’s way of admitting that senior security knowledge decays fast. SecurityX sits in the $150-per-cycle CE-fee tier, so the do-it-yourself path is 75 CEUs gathered from approved training, conferences, and documented work, plus $150 a cycle, for $300 across nine years.

Here is the honest part every lower CompTIA cert gets to dodge and this one does not. A+, Network+, Security+, and CySA+ all renew for free the moment you earn a higher CompTIA credential, so climbing the ladder zeroes out their fees as a byproduct. SecurityX is the top of that ladder. There is no higher CompTIA certification to climb into, so there is no CompTIA-to-CompTIA move that waives its fee. You can feed the 75 CEUs with a qualifying non-CompTIA credential (CompTIA grants CEU credit for things like CISSP-ISSAP and CCSP), but you are still on the CE-upload path and still owe the fee. Budget the full $300 in renewal across nine years as a near-fixed cost of holding this credential.

Nine-year cost of ownership: about $844 before prep, the $544 exam plus $300 in CE fees across two renewals. Add $100 to $170 in prep and the honest nine-year total runs $944 to $1,014. Certification renewal costs explained sets that against the rest of the registry.

SecurityX vs CISSP: the decision most readers are actually making

For most people weighing SecurityX, the real fork is against ISC2 CISSP, and the two are not interchangeable. SecurityX is hands-on and technical, has no formal experience gate you must document to be awarded the cert, and renews on a CEU-plus-fee model with no annual charge. CISSP is broader and more managerial, is gated behind five years of verified experience (with an Associate path if you lack them), and bills a $135 annual maintenance fee for as long as you hold it, which is $1,215 over nine years in fees alone.

Choose SecurityX if you want to prove deep technical security engineering ability, you cannot or would rather not clear CISSP’s five-year documentation gate yet, and you value a renewal model with no yearly bill. Choose CISSP if your target roles list it by name, you already have the experience, and you want the governance-and-management breadth that hiring committees screen for at the CISO track. Both clear the DoD 8140 baseline, so for a federal or contractor role the deciding factor is which work role the posting cites, not which logo looks heavier.

What it does for the occupation you are entering

SecurityX maps to the information security analyst occupation (BLS code 15-1212), the same broad category Security+ and CySA+ serve, though SecurityX holders frequently sit in security architect and engineering-lead roles the BLS structure does not break out on their own. The panel on this page shows the national median wage and headcount for that occupation, sourced from BLS. Read it as a description of the field, not a premium the credential pays out. What SecurityX concretely does is signal advanced, hands-on technical depth and clear the DoD 8140 baseline for senior work roles: CompTIA maps it to roles including security architect, systems requirements planner, security control assessor, and research and development specialist. Turning that signal into pay depends on the role and the experience you bring, not the card.

Common mistakes

Assuming a higher CompTIA cert will renew it for free. That reflex is correct for every CompTIA certification except this one. SecurityX is the ceiling, so there is nothing above it to climb into; plan to gather 75 CEUs and pay the $150 fee each cycle, or feed the CEUs with a qualifying outside credential.

Preparing for a scaled score. SecurityX is pass/fail with no number reported, so the “I need a 750” framing from Security+ does not apply. Study to competence across every domain rather than to a target score, because you get no partial feedback and no sense of margin.

Reaching for it before the architecture experience exists. The performance-based items assume you have designed and defended real enterprise controls. Candidates who cram definitions without having built anything tend to stall on exactly those tasks, which weigh more than the multiple-choice items around them.